The Emergence of Economic Liberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an globalized universe, the discourse on globalisation is regularly found at the meeting point of varied perspectives on autonomy and balance. The work by Junon Moneta, which is not a manifesto against globalisation as such, aims to redefine the boundaries of a modern humanism through the filter of natural transfers as envisioned by Aristotle. By denouncing artificial exchanges that fuel contemporary mechanisms of domination and precarity, the author draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to reveal the failures of our world economy.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a modern process. Its origins can be identified back to the ideas of Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the England to expand its international economic reach. Yet, what was once a commercial development strategy has converted into a tool of domination by High Finance, marked by the growth of economic liberalism. Against commonly held ideas widespread in economic circles, the author demonstrates that the economic model is actually a framework based on old customs, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.
The critique also extends to the management of the European Union, perceived as a succession of compromises that have contributed to increasing the power of financial elites instead of protecting the interests of its citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations opposed to a democratic mandate, is questioned. The current deviations, notably financial and political, have only increased the disbelief of Moneta concerning Europe’s aptitude to change intrinsically.
The author, while accepting the historical errors that have led to the current situation, does not simply criticize but also suggests alternatives aimed at reframing European policies in a more humanistic and equitable perspective. The urgency for a radical overhaul of institutions and political priorities is a central theme that runs through the entire discourse.
The text delves more intensely into the critique of the domination systems that control global economic exchanges. The study encompasses the manner in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a restricted circle of financial influencers, frequently at the expense of the majority. This economic elite, orchestrated by means of entities like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the global monetary system, imposes a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The critic reveals how these entities, claiming to monetary management and security, have over time shaped stock exchanges and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far from being a salvific alternative to old monetary restrictions, is presented as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the author presents the EU currency not as a means of unification and stability, but as being a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The adoption of the euro is described as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated citizens from governance choices, while aggravating internal differences within the Union.
The repercussions of these strategies translate in the growth of public indebtedness, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living conditions throughout the European territory. The critic emphasizes that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union stays exposed to potential disruptions, perhaps even more harmful.
In summary, the text makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where EU peoples reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, notably openness of political mechanisms and real democratic participation that would allow Europe to rebuild on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Find out more about Public Deficits in Europe
The author proposes that the solution lies in a renewal of democratic engagement, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that corresponds to the aspirations and needs of the citizens, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.